Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) Bundle
Ready to cut through the noise on Apollo Tyres Limited? This deep-dive unpacks how the company posted revenues of ₹6,561 crores in Q1 FY26 (up 4% YoY) and ₹13,392 crores for H1 FY26 (up 5% YoY), while Q2 FY26 revenue rose 6% to ₹6,831 crores thanks to a stronger European passenger-vehicle performance; profitability tells a mixed story - operating profit slipped to ₹868 crores in Q1 but jumped to ₹1,021 crores in Q2, net profit for H1 fell to ₹271 crores from ₹599 crores amid higher raw-material and restructuring costs and FY25 net profit declined 35% to ₹1,121 crores; balance-sheet repair is evident as long-term debt has fallen from ~₹6,800 crores in FY20 to ₹1,829.19 crores in Q2 FY26 with net debt-to-EBITDA at 0.3x and a target of net debt-free by FY27, even as operating cash flow eased to ₹1,823 crores in FY25 and current liabilities rose to ₹74 billion; valuation metrics show market cap at ₹33,022 crores, EV ₹35,502 crores, P/E 21.7 on EPS ₹19.8, RoNW 8.5% and RoCE 11.0%, with analysts projecting a P/E of 15.7 in FY26 and a FY27 target price of ₹530 (7x FY27E EV/EBITDA) - risks include raw-material volatility, restructuring and FX exposure while growth levers span premiumisation, PCR capacity expansion and capacity shifts to Hungary and Andhra Pradesh; read on for the detailed breakdown and model-driven scenarios investors need to assess Apollo's financial trajectory
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Revenue Analysis
Apollo Tyres reported steady top-line progression across FY25 and early FY26, driven by domestic stability and resilient European passenger vehicle demand. Key quarter and half-year figures illustrate modest growth despite mixed macro conditions.
- Q1 FY26 revenue: ₹6,561 crores (up 4% vs Q1 FY25: ₹6,335 crores)
- Q2 FY26 revenue: ₹6,831 crores (up 6% vs Q2 FY25: ₹6,437 crores)
- H1 FY26 revenue: ₹13,392 crores (up 5% vs H1 FY25: ₹12,772 crores)
- FY25 consolidated revenue: ₹26,123 crores (up 3% vs FY24: ₹25,378 crores)
| Period | Revenue (₹ crores) | YoY Change | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY26 | 6,561 | +4% | Domestic demand steady; contribution from replacement and OEM in India |
| Q1 FY25 | 6,335 | - | Base quarter |
| Q2 FY26 | 6,831 | +6% | Growth driven by European passenger vehicle segment |
| Q2 FY25 | 6,437 | - | Base quarter |
| H1 FY26 | 13,392 | +5% | Aggregate of Q1 & Q2 FY26 |
| H1 FY25 | 12,772 | - | Base half-year |
| FY25 (Consolidated) | 26,123 | +3% vs FY24 | European operations performed well despite headwinds |
| FY24 (Consolidated) | 25,378 | - | Base fiscal year |
Operational drivers and regional performance:
- Indian Operations: steady revenue growth supported by replacement market and OEM volumes; helped maintain consolidated momentum.
- European Operations: held up well despite challenging macro and raw material dynamics; notable improvement in passenger vehicle sales contributed to Q2 FY26 revenue uplift.
- Segment mix: passenger vehicle segment in Europe was a key near-term revenue driver in Q2 FY26, offsetting softness elsewhere.
For additional context on the company's background and strategic positioning, see Apollo Tyres Limited: History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Profitability Metrics
Apollo Tyres Limited's recent earnings reflect pressure from higher raw material costs and one-time restructuring charges, producing mixed operating performance but weaker net results year-over-year.- Q1 FY26 operating profit: ₹868 crores (vs ₹909 crores in Q1 FY25) - marginal decline.
- Q2 FY26 operating profit: ₹1,021 crores, up 16% from ₹878 crores in Q2 FY25.
- Q2 FY26 net profit: ₹258 crores (down from ₹297 crores in Q2 FY25), hit by restructuring costs.
- H1 FY26 net profit: ₹271 crores (vs ₹599 crores in H1 FY25), impacted by higher raw material prices and restructuring expenses.
- FY25 net profit: ₹1,121 crores, a 35% decline from ₹1,722 crores in FY24.
| Period | Operating Profit (₹ crores) | Net Profit (₹ crores) | YoY Change (Net Profit) | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 FY26 | 868 | - (included in H1) | - | Moderate margin pressure; higher RM costs |
| Q1 FY25 | 909 | - | - | Baseline for comparison |
| Q2 FY26 | 1,021 | 258 | -13.1% vs Q2 FY25 | Restructuring costs reduced net profit |
| Q2 FY25 | 878 | 297 | - | Higher net margin without restructure |
| H1 FY26 | 1,889 (sum of Q1+Q2 op profit) | 271 | -54.8% vs H1 FY25 | Raw material inflation + restructuring |
| H1 FY25 | 1,787 | 599 | - | Stronger margins |
| FY25 | - | 1,121 | -35% vs FY24 | Increased RM prices and restructuring expenses |
| FY24 | - | 1,722 | - | Prior-year base |
- Margin dynamics: Operating profit recovered in Q2 FY26, indicating some operational resilience, but net margins remain under strain due to non-operating charges.
- Cost structure: Elevated raw material prices materially reduced earnings; restructuring charges further compressed net profit in Q2 and H1 FY26.
- Investor focus: Monitor raw material trends, restructuring outcomes, and whether Q2 operating profit momentum translates into sustained net profitability improvement.
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Debt vs. Equity Structure
Apollo Tyres has undergone a marked deleveraging and earnings recovery over FY20-FY25, shifting its capital structure toward equity strength and lower financial risk. Key directional moves include significant long-term debt paydown, expanding EBITDA, and rapidly improving leverage ratios that support strategic flexibility and future deleveraging to net-zero debt.- Long-term debt fell from ~₹6,800 crore in FY20 to ~₹3,000 crore by FY25, reflecting sustained repayment and refinancing efforts.
- EBITDA expanded from ~₹1,900 crore in FY20 to an estimated ~₹3,600 crore in FY25, improving coverage and cash-generation capacity.
- Net Debt-to-EBITDA improved to 0.3x by FY25, well below the historical target of <2x, signaling conservative leverage.
- Company guidance/projections target net debt-free status by FY27, implying continued cash-flow prioritization and debt amortization.
| Metric | FY20 | FY25 (est.) | Q2 FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term debt (₹ crore) | 6,800 | ~3,000 | 1,829.19 (Q2 FY26) |
| Total debt (₹ crore) | - | - | 2,672.75 (Mar 2024 compare) |
| EBITDA (₹ crore) | 1,900 | 3,600 (est.) | - |
| Net Debt / EBITDA (x) | - | 0.3x | 1.46x (latest reported) |
- Improved EBITDA expands internal funding for capex and working capital, reducing dependency on external borrowing.
- Lower leverage (Net Debt/EBITDA ~0.3x by FY25) provides headroom for opportunistic M&A or shareholder returns without compromising credit metrics.
- Projection to be net debt-free by FY27, if realized, would materially reduce interest expense and credit risk.
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Liquidity and Solvency
Key liquidity and solvency indicators for Apollo Tyres Limited show mixed signals: improved short-term liquidity alongside reduced operating cash generation and limited capital expansion. Below are the headline figures and their immediate implications.
- Operating cash flow: declined to ₹1,823 crores in FY25 from ₹3,440 crores in FY24.
- Current assets: rose by 9% to ₹98 billion in FY25 (from ~₹89.9 billion in FY24).
- Current liabilities: increased by 4.5% to ₹74 billion in FY25 (from ₹70 billion in FY24).
- Fixed assets: decreased by 2% to ₹174 billion in FY25 (from ~₹177.6 billion in FY24).
- Net debt-to-equity ratio: 0.24, indicating manageable leverage.
- EBIT-to-interest coverage ratio: 4.28 times, providing a cushion against operational volatility.
| Metric | FY24 | FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow (₹ crores) | 3,440 | 1,823 | -47.0% |
| Current assets (₹ billion) | ~89.9 | 98 | +9% |
| Current liabilities (₹ billion) | 70 | 74 | +4.5% |
| Fixed assets (₹ billion) | ~177.6 | 174 | -2% |
| Net debt-to-equity (times) | - | 0.24 | - |
| EBIT / Interest (times) | - | 4.28 | - |
- Short-term liquidity: higher current assets vs. current liabilities (₹98b vs ₹74b) improves working capital buffer.
- Cash flow concern: near-halving of operating cash flow to ₹1,823 crores raises funding and reinvestment questions despite liquid asset coverage.
- Leverage and coverage: net debt-to-equity at 0.24 and EBIT-interest coverage of 4.28x indicate conservative leverage and adequate interest servicing capacity under current earnings.
- Capex trend: a 2% decline in fixed assets to ₹174 billion suggests limited capacity expansion or asset revaluation-monitor for maintenance vs growth capex decisions.
For context on the company's broader strategic positioning and guiding principles, see: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values (2026) of Apollo Tyres Limited.
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Valuation Analysis
Apollo Tyres' valuation profile in FY25 shows a market cap of ₹33,022 crores and an enterprise value of ₹35,502 crores, reflecting the balance of debt and cash on the balance sheet. Key return metrics and multiples indicate moderate profitability today with scope for multiple expansion if earnings accelerate.| Metric | FY25 | FY26 (E) | FY27 (E) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | ₹33,022 crores | - | - |
| Enterprise Value (EV) | ₹35,502 crores | - | - |
| EPS | ₹19.8 | - | - |
| Price-to-Earnings (P/E) | 21.7x | 15.7x (projected) | 13.1x (projected) |
| Return on Net Worth (RoNW) | 8.5% | - | - |
| Return on Capital Employed (RoCE) | 11.0% | - | - |
| Target Price (based on 7x FY27E EV/EBITDA) | ₹530 | ||
- P/E compression from 21.7x in FY25 to projected 13.1x in FY27 implies either accelerating earnings or re-rating potential for the stock.
- RoNW of 8.5% and RoCE of 11.0% indicate respectable but not stellar returns versus capital deployed; improvements in operational efficiency would support higher multiples.
- The EV of ₹35,502 crores includes net debt considerations, making EV/EBITDA multiples the appropriate valuation lens for takeover or enterprise-level comparisons.
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Risk Factors
Apollo Tyres Limited faces a set of interrelated risks that can materially affect cash flows, profitability and balance sheet strength. Below is a focused breakdown of the principal risk drivers, their transmission channels and practical investor considerations.- High capital expenditure intensity and balance sheet leverage
- Multi-year investments into factories, machinery and distribution networks - requiring sustained cash outflows before incremental returns.
- Potential for a bloated balance sheet during expansion phases if demand growth lags planned capacity ramp-up.
| Risk | Driver | Investor metric to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Capex intensity | Large new projects, modernization | Capex run-rate vs. operating cash flow; fixed asset turnover |
| Balance sheet leverage | Debt-funded expansions | Net debt / EBITDA, interest coverage |
- Raw material price volatility
- Pass-through lag to customers - timing mismatch can cause quarter-to-quarter margin swings.
- Sourcing mix (domestic vs. imports) and hedging policy impact sensitivity to commodity cycles.
- Restructuring and asset rationalization
- One-time restructuring charges (severance, write-downs, decommissioning costs) affecting near-term earnings.
- Medium-term cost savings from consolidation, but execution risk around workforce, supply chain re-routing and customer retention.
| Event | Immediate impact | Medium-term effect |
|---|---|---|
| Closure of Enschede plant | Restructuring charges; potential disruption | Lower fixed costs; potential logistics changes in European supply |
- Exchange rate and geographical exposure
- Compress reported INR EBITDA when the rupee strengthens against the euro (on translation of European earnings).
- Increase local production/import cost competitiveness if currency moves favorably, or raise costs if unfavorable.
- Competitive pressures
- Market share can be eroded if rivals out-invest in technology (e.g., low rolling resistance tyres), aftermarket reach or OEM relationships.
- Price wars in replacement tyre segments can depress volumes and margins.
| Competitor set | Pressure vector | What to monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic OEMs & aftermarket players | Price & distribution | Volume trends, ASP movement in India |
| Global tyre majors | Technology & scale | Product mix shift, R&D spend |
- Regulatory and tax changes
- GST rationalization can alter effective prices and replacement demand elasticity for tyres.
- Stricter environmental norms or carbon pricing could raise compliance costs or require additional capex.
- Track raw material cost variance - Q2 FY25 raw material inflation reported at +15% y/y and its pass-through to ASPs and margins.
- Monitor net debt and interest coverage to assess balance sheet stress during capex or restructuring phases.
- Watch FX translation sensitivity for European revenues and any official hedging disclosures.
- Follow restructuring updates (timelines, one-off charges, expected annualized savings) related to Enschede and other initiatives.
Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) - Growth Opportunities
Apollo Tyres is pursuing a multi-pronged growth strategy focused on premiumisation, capacity rationalisation, and margin expansion. Management's public targets and recent capital allocation choices point to accelerated PCR (passenger car radial) growth, structural cost improvement in Europe and India, and a balance-sheet repair path that could materially alter investor sentiment.- Premiumisation: shifting product mix toward higher-margin PCR and SUV tyres, with new premium SKUs and OEM wins in key markets.
- Capacity expansion: planned increases in PCR production to capture rising demand from replacement and OEM segments.
- Operational restructuring in Europe: closure of the Enschede plant and transfer of capacity to Hungary to reduce fixed costs and improve utilization.
- Greenfield/upgraded investments: committed spends in Hungary and Andhra Pradesh to add/shift capacity and improve per‑unit costs.
- Macro tailwinds: expected uplift in volumes from GST 2.0 reforms and continued vehicle parc expansion in India.
- Balance-sheet goal: management target to become net debt-free by FY27, supporting potential re-rating.
| Metric / Initiative | Detail / Target |
|---|---|
| Net-debt target | Target: net debt-free by FY27 (management guidance) |
| Planned capex (India + Europe) | Company indicative program: c. ₹2,000-2,500 crore over FY24-FY26 for capacity & efficiency (India: Andhra Pradesh; Europe: Hungary) |
| PCR capacity increase | Targeted uplift: phased expansion to raise PCR output by c. 30-40% vs. base (to meet replacement & OEM demand) |
| Enschede plant closure | Closure completed/announced; capacity shifted to Hungary - expected run-rate OPEX savings and higher utilisation from FY25 onward |
| European capacity (Hungary) | Incremental capacity / modernization investments to absorb Enschede volumes and improve per‑tyre costs |
| GST 2.0 impact | Industry view: potential volume uplift of mid-single-digit percentage points for tyre demand in 12-18 months post-implementation |
- Premium mix uplift: each percentage point shift towards premium PCR can materially raise blended gross margin given higher ASPs and better realisations vs. budget tyres.
- European cost optimisation: consolidation in Hungary + logistical rationalisation targeted to reduce per-unit fixed cost and shrink break-even utilisation.
- India scale benefits: Andhra Pradesh capacity and localized supply chains are expected to improve gross margins and reduce import dependency for key inputs.
- Capex-to-cash conversion: disciplined capex and improved OCF should be used to lower net debt toward the FY27 target, reducing financial charges and enabling margin recovery.
- Execution risk: timely commissioning of Hungary and Andhra projects and successful ramp-up of PCR capacity are critical to realising margin upside.
- Raw material volatility: natural rubber and synthetic rubber price swings, and freight costs, remain a near-term margin headwind if adverse.
- Demand sensitivity: GST 2.0 can be a positive catalyst, but timing and quantum of volume response are uncertain; auto OEM cyclical swings affect near-term utilisation.
- Balance-sheet progress: missing the net-debt-free FY27 target would delay a potential re-rating; accelerated deleveraging could be a key positive trigger.
| Item | Indicative figure / note |
|---|---|
| Annual consolidated revenue (approx.) | c. ₹20,000-24,000 crore (recent fiscal years; directionally illustrative) |
| EBITDA margin (recent) | Low-to-mid single digits to low double digits historically; targeted improvement with premiumisation and cost actions |
| Net debt (recent) | Management working down a multi-thousand-crore net debt base toward zero by FY27 |
| Planned near-term capex | c. ₹2,000-2,500 crore (FY24-FY26 focus: PCR capacity, Hungary/Andhra investments) |

Apollo Tyres Limited (APOLLOTYRE.NS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.