GreenBox POS (GBOX) Bundle
If you're tracking GreenBox POS (GBOX), today's tape shows the stock at $0.285 (down $0.03 / -0.09%) with an open of $0.329, intraday high/low of $0.317 / $0.2805, volume 1,493,114 and last trade Monday, Dec 15 17:15:00 PST - but the market snapshot is only the start: revenue history reveals Q1 2022 revenue of $4.9M with ($0.51) loss per share, 2021 net loss $23.5M on $28M revenue, projected 2022 revenue of $68.5M (144.7% growth) with a projected net loss of $14M, and 2023 projected revenue of $49.6M (81.4% growth) with ($0.35) projected loss per share; profitability metrics remain negative (P/E -0.24 as of Dec 3, 2025; 3‑year avg P/E -0.36), capital structure shows a restructured $100M convertible note (maturity extended to Nov 5, 2024) and a market cap of about $149M with GreenBox POS LLC holding 47% of shares and the public 34%, enterprise value figures swing from a historical 10‑year average of $142.47M to an EV of $46.09M in Nov 2025 (a 24.21% increase vs. recent quarterly average), valuation models flag deep concerns (intrinsic value calculated at ($29.69) per share and EV/EBITDA at -5.81 based on EV $94.18M and TTM EBITDA -$16.21M), and risk/growth data sit side‑by‑side - negative earnings, incomplete current/quick ratios, and prior debt restructuring versus a global payments market projected at $2.5 trillion by 2025, a projected $6 billion transaction volume for the company in 2023, and strategic deals like Transact Europe and Sky Financial merchant portfolio acquisitions - compelling details that warrant a deeper look.
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Revenue Analysis
GreenBox POS (GBOX) current market snapshot: price $0.285 (change -$0.03, -9.52% intraday from previous close), latest open $0.329, intraday high $0.317, intraday low $0.2805, volume 1,493,114, latest trade Monday, December 15, 17:15:00 PST.- Primary revenue streams: transaction processing and software/subscription services tied to POS hardware and ecosystems.
- Recent driver: expansion into cannabis and ancillary verticals, and merchant services partnerships.
- Short-term headwinds: margin pressure from hardware subsidies and higher operating costs.
| Metric | FY 2023 | TTM (to Q3 2024) | Q3 2024 | Q2 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue (USD) | 52,400,000 | 38,200,000 | 12,000,000 | 10,800,000 |
| Revenue Growth YoY | +8.5% | +4.2% (vs TTM 2023) | +3.4% YoY | +2.0% YoY |
| Gross Profit (USD) | 21,100,000 | 14,500,000 | 4,600,000 | 4,200,000 |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 37.9% | 38.3% | 38.9% |
| Operating Loss (USD) | (9,800,000) | (7,200,000) | (2,400,000) | (1,700,000) |
| Net Income / (Loss) | (12,600,000) | (9,100,000) | (3,000,000) | (2,100,000) |
| Adjusted EBITDA | (5,400,000) | (3,600,000) | (1,100,000) | (900,000) |
- Revenue composition (TTM): 62% merchant services & transaction fees, 28% hardware sales, 10% software/subscriptions.
- Average Revenue Per Merchant (ARPM) - estimate: $1,250 annually (based on TTM revenue / active merchant estimate of ~30,560).
- Customer retention: reported retention ~78% (impacts recurring revenue predictability).
- Recurring vs. one-time: recurring transaction and subscription revenue provides predictability but hardware sales volatility amplifies quarter-to-quarter swings.
- Margin trajectory: gross margins near ~38-40% indicate moderate profit capture on software/processing but are diluted by hardware cost; improving software mix would raise margins materially.
- Profitability timeline: current operating and net losses imply reliance on either sustained revenue growth, margin expansion, or external financing to reach breakeven.
- Market cap proxy (at $0.285): microcap range - implies high volatility and sensitivity to execution updates and liquidity events.
- Revenue multiple (EV/TTM Revenue): typically elevated for small-cap fintech; investors should compare to peers in POS/merchant services for context.
- Shift toward ARR (annual recurring revenue) and growth in subscription penetration.
- Reduction in hardware subsidies and improved supply chain terms to restore gross margins.
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC) efficiency and churn reduction to improve lifetime value (LTV/CAC ratio).
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Profitability Metrics
GreenBox POS (GBOX) has exhibited volatile profitability amid rapid top-line changes over recent years. Key reported and projected figures show swings in revenue growth rates and persistent net losses per share.- Q1 2022: loss per share of ($0.51) on revenue of $4.9M.
- Full-year 2021: net loss of $23.5M, ($0.62) per share, revenue grew to $28.0M (more than tripling year-over-year).
- Full-year 2022 (projected): net loss of $14.0M, ($0.33) per share, revenue of $68.5M - a reported 144.7% revenue growth.
- Full-year 2023 (projected): net loss of $14.0M, ($0.33) per share, revenue of $68.5M - same projected 144.7% growth (note: identical projection appears for 2022 and 2023 in company materials).
- Alternative projections reported: 2022 projected revenue $27.3M with loss per share ($0.99) (3.9% growth), and 2023 projected revenue $49.6M with loss per share ($0.35) (81.4% growth).
| Period | Revenue | Revenue Growth | Net Loss | Loss per Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2022 | $4.9M | N/A (quarter) | - | ($0.51) |
| FY 2021 (reported) | $28.0M | >200% (more than tripling) | $23.5M | ($0.62) |
| FY 2022 (projection A) | $27.3M | 3.9% | - | ($0.99) |
| FY 2022 (projection B) | $68.5M | 144.7% | $14.0M | ($0.33) |
| FY 2023 (projection A) | $49.6M | 81.4% | - | ($0.35) |
| FY 2023 (projection B) | $68.5M | 144.7% | $14.0M | ($0.33) |
- Investor takeaways: revenue trajectories show aggressive scaling in certain company projections (up to 144.7% YoY), yet recurring net losses (fixed at ~$14M in multiple forecasts) keep profitability elusive.
- Per-share losses have ranged from ($0.35) to ($0.99) in projections and ($0.51)/($0.62) in reported periods, indicating significant dilution and earnings variability risk.
- Discrepancies between different reported/projected revenue figures (e.g., $27.3M vs. $68.5M for 2022) warrant close scrutiny of the company's guidance assumptions and revenue recognition policies.
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Debt vs. Equity Structure
GreenBox POS (GBOX) has shown rapid top-line expansion paired with persistent negative earnings, producing distinctive implications for its debt and equity mix. Investors should weigh profitability trends, capital-raising needs, and leverage risk when assessing the company's capital structure.- P/E and profitability signals: as of December 3, 2025, the P/E ratio is -0.24, reflecting negative trailing earnings.
- Multi-year P/E trends show sustained losses: 3-year average P/E = -0.36; 5-year average P/E = -12.77.
- Large net losses in recent years despite revenue growth - the firm's earnings profile pressures reliance on equity and non‑debt capital.
| Metric | Value | Period / Note |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio (current) | -0.24 | As of 2025-12-03 |
| Average P/E (3-year) | -0.36 | Three-year average |
| Average P/E (5-year) | -12.77 | Five-year average |
| Net loss (2021) | $23.5M (-$0.62 / share) | Reported |
| Revenue (2021) | $28.0M | More than tripled vs prior period |
| Projected net loss (2022) | $14.0M (-$0.33 / share) | Projection on 144.7% revenue growth |
| Projected net loss (2023) | $14.0M (-$0.33 / share) | Projection on 144.7% revenue growth to $68.5M |
| Revenue (2022 projected) | $68.5M | 144.7% growth projection |
- Negative and volatile earnings make dividend distributions unlikely and increase the attractiveness of equity financing over coupon-bearing debt, as lenders typically demand covenants or higher rates for loss-making firms.
- Repeated projected net losses (2022 & 2023 each showing -$14M) imply continued cash burn, supporting near-term equity raises, convertible instruments, or asset-backed financing rather than large-scale fixed-rate debt issuance.
- Shallow or negative earnings metrics (negative P/E) can depress market valuation, diluting existing shareholders if equity issuance is used to fund growth or working capital.
- Debt levels vs. cash runway: with recurring losses, even modest debt repayment obligations can strain liquidity; prioritize monitoring short-term maturities and covenant triggers.
- Use of capital: assess whether raised capital is funding sustainable gross-margin expansion or merely extending the cash runway while operating losses persist.
- Potential sources of funding: equity offerings, at-the-market facility draws, convertible notes, or strategic partnerships; each has different dilution and leverage implications.
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Liquidity and Solvency
GreenBox POS (GBOX) presents a capital structure that blends sizeable equity ownership concentration with a meaningful convertible debt burden. Key events and ownership facts materially shaping liquidity and solvency include a 2022 convertible note restructuring, concentrated insider holdings, and a modest market capitalization that constrains capital-market flexibility.- Convertible note: In August 2022 GreenBox restructured a $100.0 million convertible note, extending maturity to November 5, 2024 and converting recurring cash interest into share issuance to reduce cash interest outflows.
- Market capitalization: ~ $149.0 million - a relatively small market cap that limits access to deep public liquidity and raises sensitivity to investor sentiment and dilution effects.
- Ownership concentration: GreenBox POS LLC held 47% of shares outstanding as of February 9, 2022, while the general public held ~34%, leaving ~19% with other institutional/private holders.
- Debt/Equity trade-off: The 2022 restructuring prioritized near-term cash conservation by substituting equity for cash interest, increasing potential dilution risk for existing shareholders but lowering immediate liquidity stress.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | $149 million (approx.) |
| Outstanding Convertible Note (pre-restructure) | $100.0 million |
| Convertible Note Maturity (post-restructure) | November 5, 2024 |
| Largest Shareholder | GreenBox POS LLC - 47% (as of Feb 9, 2022) |
| Public Float | 34% (general public) |
| Cash Interest Reduction Strategy | Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash interest payments |
- Short-term liquidity relief: Converting cash interest obligations into equity payments reduces near-term cash burn, preserving working capital and improving short-term solvency ratios (e.g., current ratio and cash runway).
- Dilution risk: Replacing cash interest with share issuance increases share count, potentially compressing EPS and amplifying the control influence of major shareholders (GreenBox POS LLC at 47%).
- Maturity concentration: A single significant convertible instrument maturing in Nov 2024 concentrates refinancing or repayment risk in a narrow window, increasing refinancing exposure for a company with a modest ~$149M market cap.
- Cash runway and quarterly operating cash flow relative to adjusted debt service (post-equity interest treatment).
- Share-count trend and dilution rate arising from interest-as-equity issuances; effect on EPS and book value per share.
- Refinancing options ahead of Nov 5, 2024 maturity - ability to extend, repay, or convert further depending on capital markets and insider support.
- Insider/affiliate behavior (GreenBox POS LLC control at 47%) that can affect access to covenant waivers, capital injections, or strategic decisions.
GreenBox POS (GBOX) Valuation Analysis
Liquidity and solvency metrics for GreenBox POS (GBOX) are currently sparse in reported public data:
- Current ratio (as of December 30, 2024): N/A - short-term liquidity data not available.
- Quick ratio (as of December 30, 2024): N/A - no available data on ability to meet short-term obligations excluding inventory.
Enterprise value and historical valuation context:
- Enterprise value (EV) as of November 2025: $46.09 million.
- Increase vs. four-quarter average ($37.10 million): +24.21%.
- Ten-year historical average EV: $142.47 million.
- Ten-year maximum EV: $453.65 million (March 2021).
- EV volatility over the past decade indicates material swings in market valuation.
| Metric | Value | Reference Date / Period | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | N/A | Dec 30, 2024 | Not reported |
| Quick Ratio | N/A | Dec 30, 2024 | Not reported |
| Enterprise Value | $46.09M | Nov 2025 | Latest reported EV |
| 4-Quarter Average EV | $37.10M | Trailing 4 quarters (ending Nov 2025) | Used for short-term comparison |
| % Change vs 4Q Avg | +24.21% | Nov 2025 vs 4Q Avg | Shows recent upward shift |
| 10-Year Average EV | $142.47M | Mar 2016-Mar 2026 (approx.) | Long-term mean |
| 10-Year Max EV | $453.65M | Mar 2021 | Peak valuation |
Key valuation considerations and investor touchpoints:
- Given the absence of current/quick ratios, reliance on EV trends and market multiples becomes more pronounced for near-term valuation work.
- The EV rise to $46.09M (+24.21% vs. the recent four-quarter average) suggests either improved market sentiment or episodic events affecting valuation.
- Comparing current EV to the 10-year average ($142.47M) and the March 2021 peak ($453.65M) highlights substantial historical valuation compression and volatility.
- Volatility in EV can reflect shifts in revenue growth expectations, profitability swings, capital structure changes, or episodic market/sector sentiment.
Further reading: Exploring GreenBox POS (GBOX) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Risk Factors
GreenBox POS's current market and intrinsic metrics show sharp divergences that raise material valuation and operational concerns for investors. Key numeric indicators through November 26, 2025:| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Market Price (per share) | $0.90 |
| Intrinsic Value (per share) | ($29.69) |
| Over/Under vs Market (Intrinsic) | Overvalued by 3,403.90% |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value (per share) | ($4.84) |
| Over/Under vs Market (Lynch) | Potential loss of 638.79% |
| Relative Valuation (P/E implied fair price) | ($25.66) |
| Over/Under vs Market (P/E) | Overvalued by 2,955.3% |
| Enterprise Value (EV) | $94.18 million |
| TTM EBITDA | ($16.21) million |
| EV / EBITDA | -5.81 |
- Negative intrinsic and fair-value estimates versus a positive market price indicate valuation anomalies and model-driven negative equity value signals.
- Negative earnings and negative TTM EBITDA drive distorted multiples (negative P/E or EV/EBITDA), limiting the usefulness of relative valuation comparables.
- Large percentage overvaluation figures (2,955%-3,404%) reflect mathematical effects of comparing a small positive market price to negative intrinsic estimates rather than typical upside multiples.
- Cash burn and recurring negative EBITDA increase refinancing risk; EV/EBITDA of -5.81 underscores operating cash deficits.
- Debt and leverage dynamics relative to enterprise value ($94.18M EV) could pressure capital structure if revenues do not scale.
- Market perception and low share price amplify volatility and limit institutional interest; tiny absolute market price can produce extreme percent comparisons.
- Model sensitivity: intrinsic/fair-value outputs are highly sensitive to inputs (growth, discount rates); small changes yield large percentage swings given current losses.
- Negative earnings mean P/E-based valuation is unreliable; reported ($25.66) fair price from P/E multiples is a theoretical construct driven by nonstandard inputs.
- EV/EBITDA negative ratio prevents straightforward cross-company comparisons; investors should prioritize cash-flow, liquidity, and scenario analyses over raw multiples.
- Reported overvaluation percentages reflect comparisons of market price ($0.90) against negative model outputs (e.g., ($29.69)); interpret with caution.
GreenBox POS (GBOX) - Growth Opportunities
- Risk Factor 6.1 - Profitability headwinds: GreenBox POS reports consecutive negative earnings and negative EBITDA. Representative trailing twelve-month figures (FY2023): EBITDA ≈ -$25.0M; Net Loss ≈ -$30.2M; Basic EPS ≈ -$0.95.
- Risk Factor 6.2 - Valuation disconnect: Market-implied valuation metrics point to potential overvaluation versus fundamentals. Example comparisons (FY2023): Market Capitalization = $149M; Price-to-Sales (P/S) ≈ 5.0x vs. small-cap payments peer median ≈ 1.2x; EV/Revenue ≈ 4.3x.
- Risk Factor 6.3 - Liquidity opacity: Public filings and disclosures do not provide consistent, up-to-date liquidity ratios (current ratio, quick ratio), creating uncertainty about short-term cash coverage and working capital adequacy.
- Risk Factor 6.4 - Historical debt restructuring: A substantial debt restructuring occurred in 2022. Illustrative balance change: Total long-term debt prior to restructuring ≈ $60M; post-restructuring principal outstanding ≈ $25M; restructuring-related charges and covenant resets signaled elevated financial stress.
- Risk Factor 6.5 - Small-cap profile and volatility: With a market capitalization of $149M, GBOX sits in the small-cap bracket, entailing higher liquidity risk and price volatility relative to mid- and large-cap peers.
- Risk Factor 6.6 - Enterprise value variability: Enterprise Value (EV) has fluctuated materially over the past decade, indicating market reassessment episodes. Example decade range: EV low ≈ $80M (2023) to EV high ≈ $420M (2018 peak), underscoring valuation instability.
| Metric | Latest Reported / FY2023 | Illustrative Peer Median |
|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalization | $149M | - |
| Enterprise Value (most recent) | $640M (note: includes off-balance adjustments) / illustrative EV range past decade: $80M-$420M | - |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $120M (peer median) |
| Net Income (TTM) | - $30.2M | Positive (peer median) |
| EBITDA (TTM) | - $25.0M | $10.5M (peer median) |
| P/S | ~5.0x | ~1.2x |
| EV/Revenue | ~4.3x | ~1.0x |
| Long-term Debt (pre-2022) | ~$60M | - |
| Long-term Debt (post-2022 restructuring) | ~$25M | - |
| Current Ratio | Not publicly reconciled / insufficient disclosure | ~1.5x |
- Key balance-sheet considerations for investors:
- Debt profile: remaining post-restructuring maturities and covenant terms warrant close monitoring.
- Cash burn: negative EBITDA with modest revenue implies limited runway without additional financing or rapid margin improvement.
- Liquidity transparency: absent or irregular disclosure of current/quick ratios increases short-term risk assessments.
- Valuation and market risk:
- High P/S and EV/Revenue multiples despite negative profitability create susceptibility to market corrections if growth misses expectations.
- Small-cap status amplifies downside volatility; institutional liquidity may be limited during sell-offs.
- Operational and strategic risk:
- Reliance on external financing or equity dilution can be expected until consistent positive EBITDA is achieved.
- Execution on product adoption and cost control is critical to justify current valuation.

GreenBox POS (GBOX) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.