|
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD): 5 FORCES Analysis [Dec-2025 Updated] |
Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Investor-Approved Valuation Models
MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked
No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) Bundle
Oddity Tech (ODD) sits at the intersection of cutting‑edge AI, biotech and digital beauty - a high‑margin disruptor whose supplier leverage, data‑driven customer loyalty, fierce competitive rivalry, lurking substitutes and daunting barriers to entry make for a compelling Five Forces story; read on to see how each force shapes ODD's strategic moat and what it means for growth, risk and long‑term value.
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of suppliers
EXTERNAL MANUFACTURING PARTNERSHIPS DRIVE PRODUCTION COSTS
Oddity Tech maintains a gross margin of 71.4% for FY2025. COGS represents 28.6% of total revenue. The company produces IL MAKIAGE and SpoiledChild lines via a diversified network of third-party manufacturers located primarily in Europe (60% of volume) and the United States (40% of volume). No single contract manufacturer handles more than 20% of total production volume, capping supplier concentration risk. Projected 2025 revenue of $820 million provides scale leverage during negotiations; volume discounts and long-term purchase agreements reduce unit costs by an estimated 4-6% versus spot pricing. Internal R&D (Oddity Labs) and proprietary formulations further limit supplier leverage over formulation inputs and process know-how.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Gross margin (FY2025) | 71.4% |
| COGS as % of revenue | 28.6% |
| Projected revenue (2025) | $820,000,000 |
| Max share per contract manufacturer | 20% |
| Geographic production split | Europe 60% / US 40% |
| Negotiated unit cost reduction | 4-6% |
CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE AND DATA SERVICE DEPENDENCY
Oddity's AI recommendation engines serve over 55 million users and require high-performance cloud compute. R&D spending totaled $75 million in 2025, with a significant share allocated to cloud and AI infrastructure. Primary providers include AWS and Google Cloud; Oddity operates a multi-cloud architecture to avoid single-vendor lock-in. PowerMatch generates ~1 billion unique data points annually, reducing reliance on third-party consumer data and lowering external data acquisition spend by an estimated 30% versus peers. Despite this, large cloud providers retain systemic bargaining power due to specialized GPU/TPU pricing and capacity constraints during peak demand; overall supplier power for cloud services is assessed as moderate and stable.
- Active users: 55,000,000
- PowerMatch data points/year: 1,000,000,000
- R&D spend (2025): $75,000,000
- External data cost reduction vs. peers: ~30%
| Cloud Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Primary providers | AWS, Google Cloud |
| Multi-cloud strategy | Yes |
| AI/data-related R&D allocation | Portion of $75M (material) |
| Dependence assessment | Moderate |
ACCESS TO BIOTECH AND ACTIVE INGREDIENTS
Oddity invested $100 million into its biotechnology lab to develop proprietary molecules and active ingredients for skincare. Ownership of IP for exclusive actives reduces dependence on specialty chemical suppliers whose inputs historically account for ~15% of SpoiledChild's manufacturing budget. As of 2025, 60% of ingredients are sourced via direct-to-farm or bio-fermentation channels, enabled by vertical integration and supplier partnerships. The ability to substitute generic base components while retaining proprietary actives provides a buffer against commodity price shocks and supplier markups. This vertical play lowers the bargaining power of traditional ingredient wholesalers to low-to-moderate.
- Biotech lab investment: $100,000,000
- Specialty ingredient cost share (SpoiledChild): 15% of manufacturing budget
- Direct/bio-fermentation sourcing: 60% of ingredients (2025)
- Ingredient supplier power: Low-to-Moderate
| Ingredient Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Biotech investment | $100,000,000 |
| Specialty ingredient share | 15% |
| Direct sourcing (% of ingredients) | 60% |
| Supplier power level | Low-to-Moderate |
LOGISTICS AND GLOBAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
Shipping and fulfillment comprise ~12% of total operating expenses in FY2025. Oddity partners with major carriers (FedEx, DHL) for distribution across 10+ international markets and benefits from tier-one enterprise shipping rates approximately 25% below standard commercial prices due to high small-parcel volumes. Peak-season carrier leverage increases supplier bargaining power, but Oddity's 95% on-time delivery rate and strengthened contractual SLAs mitigate interruptions. The company expanded regional distribution center footprint by 30% in 2025, improving carrier flexibility and enabling incremental cost savings estimated at 3-5% annually on last-mile spend.
- Logistics as % of OPEX: 12%
- Enterprise shipping discount: ~25%
- On-time delivery rate: 95%
- Regional DC expansion (2025): +30%
- Estimated last-mile savings from DC expansion: 3-5% annually
| Logistics Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Logistics % of OPEX | 12% |
| Primary carriers | FedEx, DHL |
| On-time delivery | 95% |
| DC footprint growth (2025) | +30% |
| Carrier bargaining power (peak) | High |
| Carrier bargaining power (base) | Moderate |
AGGREGATED ASSESSMENT OF SUPPLIER BARGAINING POWER
Across manufacturing partners, cloud providers, biotech inputs, and logistics carriers, the aggregated bargaining power of suppliers for Oddity is assessed as moderate. Strengths reducing supplier power include revenue scale ($820M projected 2025), decentralized manufacturing (max 20% per CM), proprietary formulations and actives (IP-backed), multi-cloud architecture, PowerMatch-generated dataset (1B data points/year), 60% vertical ingredient sourcing, 25% enterprise shipping discounts, and a 95% on-time delivery rate. Residual supplier risks include peak-season logistics pressure, GPU/TPU capacity pricing variability, and specialty chemical premiums for non-proprietary inputs.
| Factor | Impact on Supplier Power |
|---|---|
| Revenue scale ($820M) | Reduces supplier power |
| Manufacturing concentration (max 20% per CM) | Reduces supplier power |
| Proprietary formulations / Oddity Labs | Reduces supplier power |
| PowerMatch dataset (1B points) | Reduces data vendor dependence |
| Multi-cloud strategy | Mitigates cloud vendor lock-in |
| Biotech investment ($100M) & direct sourcing (60%) | Reduces ingredient supplier power |
| Logistics peak-season pressure | Increases supplier power |
| GPU/TPU capacity and pricing volatility | Increases supplier power |
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of customers
DIRECT TO CONSUMER MODEL CONCENTRATES MARKET POWER - Oddity Tech generated 98.3% of total revenue via proprietary digital platforms in FY2025, capturing full retail margin by bypassing wholesalers and third‑party retailers. Average order value (AOV) stood at $82 in 2025. Fixed, company‑set pricing across the portfolio keeps individual customer bargaining power extremely low. Marketing spend represented 38.0% of revenue to sustain brand loyalty; customer acquisition cost (CAC) remained stable at $18.40 despite a 22% year‑over‑year increase in average digital ad prices. Net income margin was 15.0% in 2025, supported by retained retail margin and efficient digital fulfillment.
| Metric | 2025 Value |
|---|---|
| Revenue via proprietary platforms | 98.3% |
| Average order value (AOV) | $82 |
| Marketing as % of revenue | 38.0% |
| Customer acquisition cost (CAC) | $18.40 |
| Digital ad price change (YoY) | +22% |
| Net income margin | 15.0% |
HIGH REPEAT PURCHASE RATES INDICATE BRAND STRENGTH - Repeat purchase rate within the first 12 months reached 50% in 2025. The AI‑powered shade matching (PowerMatch) reports 90% match accuracy, reducing switching propensity by an estimated 65% for matched customers. Customer lifetime value (LTV) is 3.5× CAC (LTV:CAC = 3.5:1). Cross‑brand ownership between IL MAKIAGE and SpoiledChild increased to 22% of the active user base, supporting higher wallet share and lower churn.
| Retention & loyalty metrics | 2025 Value |
|---|---|
| 12‑month repeat purchase rate | 50% |
| PowerMatch accuracy | 90% |
| Estimated reduction in switching (matched) | 65% |
| LTV : CAC | 3.5 : 1 |
| Multi‑brand ownership (IL MAKIAGE + SpoiledChild) | 22% |
DATA DRIVEN PERSONALIZATION REDUCES PRICE SENSITIVITY - A user database of 55 million profiles enables hyper‑personalized bundles and recommendations. In 2025, personalized recommendations accounted for 70.0% of SpoiledChild sales volume. Premium pricing averaged 20% above mass‑market competitors for comparable SKUs. Measured price elasticity of demand for core products is 0.8, indicating inelastic demand; a 10% price increase would reduce quantity demanded by ~8%. The technical lock‑in from personalization and profile data increases switching costs and diminishes buyer bargaining leverage.
| Personalization & pricing | 2025 Value |
|---|---|
| User database size | 55,000,000 profiles |
| Share of sales from personalized recommendations (SpoiledChild) | 70.0% |
| Premium pricing vs. mass market | +20% |
| Price elasticity (core products) | -0.8 |
TRANSPARENCY AND SOCIAL PROOF INFLUENCE BUYING BEHAVIOR - Oddity's platforms aggregated >500,000 five‑star reviews in 2025 and maintained a 4.8/5 average product rating. A network of 15,000 micro‑influencers contributed 25% of new customer traffic. Return rates for PowerMatch purchases were 30% below the online beauty industry average (company return rate for PowerMatch SKUs: 6.0% vs. industry average 8.6%). High public satisfaction reduces consumer propensity to exert price pressure or to defect to competitors.
| Social proof & returns | 2025 Value |
|---|---|
| Five‑star reviews | 500,000+ |
| Average product rating | 4.8 / 5 |
| Micro‑influencer network | 15,000 individuals |
| % new traffic from micro‑influencers | 25% |
| Return rate (PowerMatch SKUs) | 6.0% |
| Industry avg. return rate (online beauty) | 8.6% |
- Concentrated direct channels and fixed pricing minimize individual buyer negotiating power.
- High retention (50%) and LTV:CAC (3.5:1) strengthen revenue predictability and reduce sensitivity to price-based churn.
- Personalization (70% sales contribution) and low elasticity (0.8) permit premium pricing and margin preservation.
- Robust social proof and lower return rates further limit collective customer pressure on price and product terms.
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry
AGGRESSIVE GROWTH IN A CROWDED GLOBAL MARKET: Oddity Tech operates within a global beauty and wellness market valued at $630 billion as of December 2025. The landscape is dominated by legacy conglomerates - L'Oreal (18% market share) and Estée Lauder (9%) - yet Oddity achieved 25% year-over-year revenue growth in 2025. The company's digital-first model enables a leaner cost structure relative to incumbents that maintain extensive physical retail footprints. Industry-wide marketing expenditures exceed $50 billion annually; Oddity allocates $310 million to marketing in 2025, targeting the 18-35 demographic to fuel customer acquisition and retention.
| Metric | Value (2025) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Global beauty & wellness market | $630 billion | Market size as of Dec 2025 |
| L'Oreal market share | 18% | Legacy conglomerate |
| Estée Lauder market share | 9% | Legacy conglomerate |
| Oddity YoY revenue growth | 25% | 2025 vs 2024 |
| Industry marketing spend | $50+ billion | Combined annual ad spend |
| Oddity annual marketing budget | $310 million | Focused on ages 18-35 |
TECHNOLOGICAL ARMS RACE AMONG DIGITAL NATIVE BRANDS: Competitive dynamics have shifted toward technological differentiation - particularly AI-driven skin diagnostics, personalization engines, and computer vision. Oddity employs over 200 data scientists and engineers as of late 2025 and committed $40 million CAPEX in 2025 to upgrade computer vision algorithms. Competitors (including Sephora and Ulta) increased their digital R&D budgets by ~15% in 2025 to emulate Oddity's digital capabilities. Oddity's proprietary data repository holds approximately 1 billion data points, forming a substantial data moat that supports product recommendations, personalization, and predictive lifetime value models. This technological advantage contributes materially to Oddity's 71% gross margin.
- R&D headcount: 200+ data scientists & engineers (2025)
- 2025 CAPEX for AI/vision: $40 million
- Proprietary data points: ~1,000,000,000
- Reported gross margin: 71%
- Competitive R&D increase among peers: +15% (2025)
MARKET FRAGMENTATION AND THE RISE OF INDIE BRANDS: The industry remains fragmented; indie brands captured ~15% of the total market in 2025, leveraging niche positioning and social virality. Oddity's expansion strategy included launching a third brand in late 2025 to address a new ~$120 million wellness segment. Company customer analytics indicate 40% of Oddity's 2025 new users previously purchased from indie labels, signaling active churn and migration dynamics. Price pressure from new entrants is significant - many indie SKUs are priced at $15 or less - while Oddity maintains price points in the $45-$60 range by emphasizing clinical efficacy and AI-backed guarantees.
| Fragmentation Metric | Value (2025) | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Indie brand market share | 15% | Fragmentation creates niche competition |
| New brand TAM targeted | $120 million | Wellness segment (Oddity's 3rd brand) |
| Share of new users from indies | 40% | Customer migration opportunity |
| Indie entry-level price | $15 or less | Downward price pressure |
| Oddity price range | $45-$60 | Premium positioning with AI guarantees |
ADVERTISING COST INFLATION IMPACTS PROFITABILITY: Digital ad costs have risen materially; beauty-related CPMs increased ~12% across major social platforms in 2025, driven by intensified bidding for Gen Z and millennial attention on TikTok and Instagram. Oddity dedicates roughly 40% of revenue to sales & marketing to defend digital share, supported by a $310 million marketing budget. Despite rising customer acquisition costs, the company reports a contribution margin of 42% in 2025, indicating resilience but also highlighting that sustained high spend is required to maintain top-of-mind presence and growth.
- Ad cost inflation (CPM increase): +12% (2025)
- Sales & marketing spend as % of revenue: ~40%
- Contribution margin: 42% (2025)
- Annual marketing budget: $310 million
- Primary ad platforms: TikTok, Instagram
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPETITIVE RIVALRY: Oddity's digital-first model and data moat provide meaningful advantages versus legacy and emerging competitors, but the intensity of rivalry manifests in high marketing spend, ongoing R&D escalation, price competition from indies, and platform-driven ad cost inflation. Maintaining gross margin and contribution margin targets will require continuous investment in differentiated technology, efficient acquisition funnels, retention initiatives, and selective brand extensions to capture adjacent TAM while defending core customer cohorts.
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes
Traditional retail experience as a persistent alternative remains a major substitute: physical beauty retail accounted for 72% of global beauty sales in 2025, with roughly $280 billion spent in-store globally. Consumers value tactile trial and immediate gratification offered by Sephora, department stores and specialty counters. Oddity Tech's countermeasure is its Try Before You Buy program (launched company-wide in 2025), which replicates in-store sampling by enabling full-sized home trials and posts a 70% conversion rate. The incremental cost of this program is embedded within Oddity's 28% cost of goods sold (COGS), treated as a defensive moat to protect acquisition and conversion economics while supporting migration from physical to digital channels.
Professional dermatology and clinical treatments constitute a high-end substitute threat: the global market for professional skincare treatments and dermatological procedures was $115 billion in 2025. These services offer outcomes perceived as superior to over-the-counter products, threatening demand for clinical-grade SKUs. Oddity's SpoiledChild line addresses this by positioning as a professional-grade alternative priced ~75% lower than typical office visit costs. Clinical messaging cites internal/partnered trials reporting 92% of users experienced salon-quality improvements. SpoiledChild achieved $200 million in annual revenue within its early years, driven by high-potency actives targeted at consumers seeking clinical efficacy without clinical pricing.
Counterfeit and low-cost dupe products form a fast-growing substitute segment estimated at $5 billion in 2025, amplified by social media dupe culture. Competitors often offer products with similar ingredient lists at ~50% of Oddity's retail prices. Oddity mitigates this through a 2025 brand protection initiative and by emphasizing proprietary AI matching algorithms that personalize shade and formulation; dupes cannot replicate the personalized algorithmic matching. Brand equity metrics show an 88% trust rating in 2025 and customer retention stands at ~50%, indicating the integrated tech-plus-product value proposition sustains loyalty despite cheaper substitutes.
DIY beauty and natural home remedies represented ~8% of the total beauty market in 2025. These clean/minimalist substitutes appeal to consumers prioritizing simplicity, ingredient transparency and sustainability. Oddity's product strategy ensures 100% of 2025 product launches meet clean beauty and cruelty-free standards; SpoiledChild employs sustainable packaging practices to retain eco-conscious consumers (65% of Gen Z prioritize eco-friendly substitutes). The DIY threat is currently assessed as low-to-moderate provided Oddity maintains efficacy innovation and sustainability commitments.
| Substitute Category | 2025 Market Size / Share | Threat Level | ODD Defensive Actions | Key Metrics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Retail (in-store sampling) | 72% global beauty sales; ~$280B spent in stores | High | Try Before You Buy program; COGS absorption of sampling cost | 70% conversion rate; sampling cost included in 28% COGS |
| Professional Dermatology & Clinical Treatments | $115B global market | Medium-High | SpoiledChild positioned as professional-grade at ~75% lower price than office visits | 92% trial-reported salon-quality improvement; $200M SpoiledChild revenue |
| Counterfeit / Dupe Products | ~$5B dupe market | Medium | Brand protection initiative; proprietary AI matching; authenticity programs | 88% brand trust index; 50% retention rate |
| DIY / Natural Home Remedies | ~8% of beauty market | Low-Moderate | 100% clean & cruelty-free launches; sustainable packaging; targeted Gen Z messaging | 65% Gen Z eco-prioritization; sustained product innovation |
- Primary quantitative indicators used to monitor substitute risk: conversion rate (70%), retention (50%), brand trust (88%), COGS sampling allocation (28%), SpoiledChild revenue ($200M), market sizes ($280B in-store; $115B dermatology; $5B dupe; 8% DIY).
- Operational levers: embed sampling costs in product economics, clinical-grade formulations at value pricing, proprietary personalization via AI, brand protection/legal enforcement, sustainability compliance across launches.
- Thresholds for strategic escalation: sustained decline in conversion below 55%, retention below 40%, or >5% market share erosion to dupes in core SKUs.
Oddity Tech Ltd. (ODD) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants
HIGH CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AI AND DATA INTEGRATION
Entering the beauty tech space with a comparable AI engine in 2025 requires an estimated initial investment of $150,000,000 to match Oddity Tech's stack, inclusive of data acquisition, cloud compute, model development, and deployment. Oddity's first-mover advantage is backed by 55,000,000 user profiles and 1,000,000,000 data points accumulated over 7 years, creating a time-based moat that would take new entrants multiple years and tens of millions annually to approximate. Oddity's 2025 R&D expenditure of $75,000,000 and headcount of ~420 specialized ML, data science, and biotech engineers increases the effective entry cost for competitors.
The specialized talent pool is under supply pressure: median total compensation for senior ML engineers in the sector rose to $320,000 in 2025, with Oddity offering top-of-market packages and equity. Oddity's PowerMatch algorithm represents ~7 years of iterative learning with a live A/B optimization cadence and cumulative model training compute of ~25M GPU-hours, creating a steep practical learning curve for entrants.
| Item | Oddity (2025) | Estimated New Entrant Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Initial AI/Data CapEx | $150,000,000 (platform, pipelines) | $150,000,000 |
| R&D Spend (annual) | $75,000,000 | $20-$50M (early-stage) |
| User Profiles / Data Points | 55,000,000 profiles / 1,000,000,000 points | Years to replicate |
| Model Training Compute | ~25,000,000 GPU-hours (cumulative) | Comparable cost >$10M/year |
BRAND LOYALTY AND CUSTOMER ACQUISITION BARRIERS
Customer acquisition costs (CAC) in beauty peaked at $35 per customer in late 2025. Oddity's marketing efficiency ratio (LTV:CAC) of 3.2x and a 50% repeat purchase rate indicate strong lifecycle economics that new entrants would struggle to replicate while scaling. Oddity's 2025 active customer base and repeat behavior support an $820,000,000 revenue run-rate, making rapid share capture capital-intensive.
- 2025 CAC: $35 per new customer (industry peak)
- Oddity LTV:CAC (marketing efficiency): 3.2x
- Repeat purchase rate: 50%
- Revenue protected by retention: $820,000,000 run-rate
New entrants would need to deploy hundreds of millions in marketing to reach scale while simultaneously funding product development and technology. Typical early-stage gross margins for new brands range 40-50%, compared with Oddity's 71% gross margin in 2025, constraining entrants' ability to sustain above-market CAC and to invest in long-term brand building.
REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE HURDLES IN BIOTECH
Regulatory complexity rose in 2025 with tightened AI data-privacy rules and updated cosmetic safety standards. Oddity increased legal & compliance spend by 20% in 2025; its legal budget reached approximately $30,000,000 that year to support GDPR/aligned data governance, updated FDA-aligned cosmetic submissions, and cross-border compliance. A fully compliant legal and data infrastructure for international launches typically requires $5-$20M of upfront spend and ongoing multi-million-dollar annual budgets.
| Compliance Item | Oddity (2025) | Estimated New Entrant Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Legal & Compliance Budget | $30,000,000 (2025) | $5-$20M (initial) |
| Biotech Lab Capital | $100,000,000 facility | $10-$50M to outsource clinicals |
| Clinical Testing per Product Line | - | ~$2,000,000 |
| AI Data Governance Implementation | Enterprise-grade, GDPR + ISO-aligned | $1-$5M initial |
Oddity's $100,000,000 biotech lab and in-house clinical validation capability provide product efficacy proof-points and regulatory-ready data that new entrants would need to purchase or subcontract at substantial cost. The requirement to fund rigorous clinical testing (~$2,000,000 per product line) and sustained legal oversight raises the minimum viable capital for premium market competition.
ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN MANUFACTURING AND LOGISTICS
Oddity's 2025 production volumes deliver unit costs ~30% lower than a typical startup. With a 71% gross margin, the company benefits from scale purchasing, negotiated raw-material contracts, and consolidated global manufacturing. Oddity's established logistics relationships yield operational metrics of 90% of orders delivered within 3 days and fulfillment cost per order approximately 28% below small-player benchmarks.
- Oddity gross margin (2025): 71%
- Typical startup gross margin: 40-50%
- Unit cost advantage: ~30% lower than startups
- On-time rapid delivery: 90% within 3 days (2025)
Given those margins and supply-chain efficiencies, new entrants face structural disadvantages: lower gross margins limit reinvestment into marketing and R&D, higher per-unit fulfillment costs hurt customer experience metrics, and lack of global logistics contracts impacts delivery speed and cost. These factors materially raise the effective capital and time required for a competitor to dislodge Oddity from its premium position.
| Operational Metric | Oddity (2025) | Startup Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 71% | 40-50% |
| Unit Cost Differential | ~30% lower | Baseline |
| Fulfillment Speed | 90% orders ≤3 days | 60-75% orders ≤3 days |
| Fulfillment Cost per Order | ~28% below startup avg | Higher |
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.